3 weeks ago
Strategy enforcement president Michael Saylor and Blockstream CEO Adam Back person doubled down connected their absorption to BIP-110, a projected impermanent fork to bounds non-monetary transactions connected the Bitcoin network.
Bitcoin Improvement Proposal-110 was introduced successful December 2025 to halt nonfungible token-like Ordinals inscriptions and different arbitrary information from “spamming” the web and to sphere Bitcoin’s main usage arsenic a peer-to-peer currency system.
While captious of Ordinals activity, Saylor and Back fearfulness a fork could do much harm than good to the network’s credibility. “There are 110 things much unsafe to Bitcoin than spam,” Saylor said successful a post to X connected Saturday, adding that BIP-110 could invalidate mean transactions connected the network.
Source: Michael Saylor
BIP-110 is 1 of the much notable protocol-level disputes successful the Bitcoin improvement assemblage since the Blocksize Wars betwixt 2015 and 2017, erstwhile ecosystem participants debated whether it was worthy risking a concatenation divided to rise the artifact size bounds for scalability.
BIP-110 was introduced by pseudonymous Bitcoin developer “Dathon Ohm” with the enactment of Ocean protocol laminitis Luke Dashjr.
BIP-110 is simply a agelong changeable from activating
BIP-110 won't beryllium activated unless 55% of Bitcoin nodes validating blocks are successful enactment of the connection crossed a Bitcoin artifact “period.”
In the past period, play fig 475 betwixt artifact 955,584 and 957,599, lone 1% of blocks were BIP-110-supportive.
The quality comes astatine a clip erstwhile Ordinals enactment is astatine adjacent all-time lows, with less than 10,000 Ordinals inscribed into the Bitcoin blockchain connected a regular ground implicit the past month, down massively from the much than 400,000 seen during its highest successful August 2023.
Meanwhile, Back offered a deeper critique of BIP-110, describing it arsenic a “quest to constabulary different people.”
Related: Bitcoin doesn't request Ethereum-style yield, says Strategy's Michael Saylor
He said Bitcoin’s decentralization should mean “you can’t enforce your views connected others,” calling it incompatible with Bitcoin’s cypherpunk ethos of permissionless, censorship-resistant money.
Dashjr and different BIP-110 proponents person called Ordinals-driven bloat a "serious threat" to the network, prompting the request for an imminent fix.
They person besides argued BIP-110 wouldn't cause a concatenation split, arsenic galore fear, portion adding that the BIP-110 fork imposes a impermanent one-year bounds and frankincense wouldn’t invalidate fee-paying transactions implicit the agelong term.
Features: From Bitcoin critics to blockchain believers: The 5 biggest crypto backflips
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This quality nonfiction is produced successful accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to supply close and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify accusation independently.
English (US) 