Blockchain analytics unable to prevent FTX-level illicit schemes

1 year ago

Data transparency has been a focal constituent for the crypto industry, but the FTX fiasco has shown that centralized exchanges (CEX) are not transparent enough. So far, crypto analytics firms are seemingly not susceptible of tracking transactions to forestall collapses similar FTX.

All Bitcoin (BTC) transactions are disposable publically on-chain, which enables tracking specified transactions erstwhile sending crypto from 1 code to another. However, this is not the lawsuit erstwhile it comes to interacting with a centralized crypto exchange.

Cointelegraph spoke with executives astatine blockchain quality firms, including Chainalysis, Nansen and Whale Alert, to larn much insights astir tracking illicit CEX transactions on-chain.

According to Chainalysis, a large blockchain information level that cooperates with galore governments crossed the world, determination is presently nary on-chain tracking instrumentality that could hint funds done a CEX.

“Chainalysis — oregon immoderate different blockchain investigation instrumentality — can’t hint funds done a centralized service, due to the fact that the mode that these services store and negociate funds deposited by users inherently makes further tracing inaccurate,” a spokesperson for Chainalysis told Cointelegraph.

“Even if you could hint done a centralized exchange, on-chain investigation unsocial cannot uncover fraudulent intent down transactions,” Chainalysis’ typical noted. The spokesperson stressed that Alameda’s leaked off-chain equilibrium sheet was the archetypal happening to uncover that thing was wrong.

While blockchain investigation tin way deposits connected CEXs, determination is nary accidental to entree their liabilities, according to Nansen expert Andrew Thurman. “FTX halted withdrawals erstwhile they inactive had successful excess of a cardinal successful assorted integer assets; we present cognize they had a acold greater sum successful liabilities,” helium said.

Thurman besides argued that a proof-of-reserves (PoR) exemplary — the increasingly fashionable effort of CEXs to beryllium transparency — is “only a fractional measure, but it’s a bully one.”

Despite blockchain investigation having constricted opportunities successful tracking illicit transactions by CEXs truthful far, immoderate monitoring services inactive effort to beryllium that the manufacture has chances to forestall issues similar FTX clang 1 day.

“We are presently doing humanities equilibrium checks connected our known FTX addresses — deposit and different related addresses — to find if this could person been spotted sooner,” Whale Alert co-founder and CEO Frank van Weert told Cointelegraph successful November.

Whale Alert has since had to wantonness the task due to the fact that the level did not person capable resources to decently bash the scan of astir 2 years of data. “It takes rather a spot of computing powerfulness which we did not person available,” the CEO said.

Weert besides noted that “it is imaginable to way exchanges,” but platforms similar Coinbase and FTX marque it a spot much analyzable to way incoming coins arsenic they don't usage blistery wallets. He added that exchanges are “extremely reluctant to cooperate,” with galore of them declining to remark connected Whale Alert’s findings for "security" reasons.

Related: What blockchain investigation tin and can't bash to find FTX's missing funds: Blockchain.com CEO

Whale Alert CEO emphasized that the full crypto manufacture is liable for the illness of FTX, stating:

“So acold the industry's absorption has been connected nett alternatively than due infrastructure. The lone mode to retrieve from the messiness is to summation the public's spot again connected the ground of due transparency, which does not travel from Merkle Tree audits.”

According to immoderate manufacture executives, blockchain investigation platforms are not funny successful catching illicit players on-chain successful the archetypal place.

“First, blockchain investigation doesn’t truly bash anything, and second, they are not focused connected fraud and suspicious transactions astatine the speech level. Their customers are the exchanges and you don’t wound the manus that feeds you,” Bitcoin proponent Samson Mow told Cointelegraph.

View source