- News
- Regulation & Legal
- 'Shadow Stocks': Wall Street Watchdog Fights Massive CFTC Stock Perps Push
Published:Nov 12, 2026, 2:45 PM EST
The amicus curiae brief, filed by Better Markets, erstwhile SEC Commissioner Allison Herren Lee, and Harvard Law Professor John C. Coates, argues that single-stock perpetual futures represent swaps—and, consequently, bypass existent Dodd-Frank Act protections for retail investors nether the CFTC’s caller rules.
Published: Nov 12, 2026, 2:45 PM EST
Key Takeaways
- Better Markets backed a suit against the CFTC to halt its support of perpetual U.S. banal derivatives.
- The radical argues these products are security-based swaps lacking fixed dates, requiring SEC regulation.
- They pass the 6-to-1 leverage and automatic liquidations could rapidly hitch retired retail capitalist portfolios.
Better Markets Files Brief to Challenge CFTC’s Approval Of Perpetual Derivatives
The ineligible conflict implicit the CFTC’s determination to let perpetual derivatives connected idiosyncratic U.S. stocks is heating up, and third-parties are present raising their voices.
Better Markets, an enactment that “fights for a fiscal strategy that serves nine and supports the productive economy,” has filed a friend-of-the-court (amicus curiae) brief to backmost the Capital Markets Alliance’s (CMA) situation to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) support of perpetual derivatives connected idiosyncratic U.S. stocks.
In the brief, filed by erstwhile SEC Acting Chair and Commissioner Allison Herren Lee and erstwhile SEC General Counsel and Acting Director of the Division of Corporate Finance John C. Coates, the enactment argues that these perpetuals should beryllium classified arsenic security-based swaps and not futures, arsenic they deficiency a fixed transportation date.
As a effect of being classified arsenic security-based swaps, these autumn nether the SEC’s jurisdiction nether the Dodd-Frank Act and indispensable not bypass captious extortion measures, including registration and the request that trading should lone beryllium conducted connected regulated nationalist securities exchanges.
Furthermore, Better Markets, which has a past of opposing decentralized initiatives, stresses that approving these swaps brings terrible risks to retail investors, arsenic they harvester precocious leverage, nary expiration date, and automated liquidation features, enticing the enactment of a speculative ecosystem.
“These ‘perpetual futures’ are truly shadiness stocks that are leveraged astir six-to-one, meaning an investor’s full portfolio tin beryllium zeroed retired with conscionable a 16% question successful the market. That level of volatility is communal with azygous stocks and truthful the hazard of full nonaccomplishment is existent and apt frequent, ruining retail investors portion enriching the level companies,” said Better Markets, informing astir the risks of opening these tools to retail investors.
“As we person seen successful different nations wherever these products proliferate, investors tin get wiped retired successful a substance of minutes, including overnight erstwhile automatic liquidation thresholds tin beryllium triggered,” the enactment concluded.
Better Markets’ opinions coincide with those of the CMA, which stressed that the CFTC’s caller support of a multitude of filings for securities-based products fails to explicate wherefore it has agelong treated perpetual derivatives arsenic swaps, and disregards the interaction that this caller imaginativeness volition person connected investors and the wider securities market.
The CMA, representing manufacture heavyweights similar Cboe Global Markets, Citadel Securities, and Healthy Markets Association, asks to vacate the approvals of these products and admit that they represent security-based swaps, efficaciously barring the CFTC’s purported quality to o.k. them portion the lawsuit is pending.
The lawsuit is becoming a large conflict facing manufacture incumbents and the CFTC, which is besides facing authorities regulators implicit prediction markets. The SEC has already filed an amicus little supporting the CFTC’s caller regularisation changes, contesting CMA’s allegations that it is “going rogue.”
About the author
WRITTEN BYSergio Goschenko
Sergio is simply a cryptocurrency writer based successful Venezuela with 2,000+ articles published, cited successful dozens of papers and reports.

1 day ago










English (US)