Stablecoins, Not Bitcoin, In Focus At First U.S. Digital Assets Subcommittee Hearing

3 hours ago

Today, the Senate Banking Subcommittee connected Digital Assets hosted its archetypal hearing, entitled “Exploring Bipartisan Legislative Frameworks for Digital Assets,” astatine which definite members of the subcommittee and crypto manufacture witnesses predominantly discussed stablecoin regulation.

Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), a long-time proponent of the Bitcoin and integer plus industry, presided implicit the proceeding with assistance from ranking subordinate of the subcommittee, Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ).

The witnesses included Tim Massad, erstwhile CFTC Chair and Research Fellow astatine the Kennedy School of Government astatine Harvard University; Jai Massari, Chief Legal Officer astatine Lightspark; Jonathan Jachym, Global Head of Policy and Government Relations astatine Kraken; and Lewis Cohen, Partner astatine Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP. 

Setting the code for the meeting, Senator Lummis stated that she intends to bash her portion successful passing bipartisan authorities for Bitcoin and stablecoins. (This was 1 of the fewer times during the gathering that the connection “Bitcoin” was mentioned. One of the lone different times successful the proceeding it was mentioned was erstwhile Massad voiced that he’s objected to the instauration of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.)

Throughout the hearing, Massad stressed the value of monitoring stablecoin transactions. He suggested extending the “regulatory perimeter” to code AML (Anti-Money Laundering) challenges associated with stablecoins and adjacent projected that astute contracts beryllium designed successful a mode that mitigates the hazard of atrocious actors utilizing them.

“Our full [Bank Secrecy Act] model relies connected centralized intermediaries.” @timmassad calls connected Congress to widen the “regulatory perimeter” and necessitate “stablecoin issuers to aggressively show transactions and frost stablecoins.” pic.twitter.com/Y5TyGRx4i1

— Nick Anthony (@EconWithNick) February 26, 2025

“[We might] programme astute contracts truthful that transactions can’t spell done unless idiosyncratic has been decently vetted,” said Massad.

Massad besides suggested that stablecoin issuers “aggressively show stablecoin activity” arsenic a means to support an oculus retired for AML violations.

Massari pointed retired that authorities tin besides surveil stablecoin transactions, arsenic these assets tally connected nationalist blockchains. She besides called for sensible regularisation astir the exertion — truthful agelong arsenic it isn’t excessively heavy-handed.

“We person a inclination [when regulating] fiscal services to instrumentality the caller happening and cram it into the old,” she said.

What is more, she besides advocated for a “common acceptable of standards” to govern stablecoin issuers truthful that users tin consciousness much assured successful each stablecoins being decently backed.

Jachym made efforts to displacement the absorption of the proceeding from stablecoins to the Digital Asset Market Structure bill, claiming that it was “critical” that regulatory agencies conception wide guidelines for which integer assets are securities and which aren’t.

He didn’t person overmuch uptake though. Massad stated that discussing stablecoins was much important than discussing the marketplace operation bill, making the lawsuit that the marketplace operation measure isn’t a pressing matter, arsenic regulators tin enactment with existing securities laws to modulate crypto markets.

Jachym stressed the constituent that “the jurisdictional lines [around] integer assets should beryllium simple” and said that “the deficiency of regulatory certainty successful the U.S. has impeded maturation [in the crypto industry.]”

Cohen made a akin claim, stating that crypto entrepreneurs successful the U.S. “feel the changeless menace of litigation,” alluding to erstwhile SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s “regulation-by-enforcement” approach.

He besides shared that the “uncertain regulatory situation has near some consumers and users of integer assets astatine risk.”

The lone subordinate successful the proceeding who straight pushed backmost connected the U.S. government’s tendency to (over)regulate integer assets was Senator Bernie Moreno (R-OH).

“The authorities has this full and implicit tendency to power things,” said Senator Moreno, who went connected to stock that a fig of caller technologies person been utilized for illicit purposes, not conscionable crypto.

“Why each of a abrupt erstwhile we got to integer currencies did we deliberation present successful Washington, D.C. that we are going to determine the gait of innovation?” helium concluded.

Throughout the meeting, the subcommittee members asked the witnesses which jurisdictions astir the satellite the U.S. should instrumentality cues from successful modeling its integer plus regulatory framework.

Massad made the lawsuit for Europe and the Markets successful Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) framework, which the European Union conscionable enactment into effect, portion Jachym suggested looking to states similar Wyoming, wherever Kraken is based, to larn from the crypto laws the state’s legislature has passed.

While the Senators connected the subcommittee and the witnesses contiguous offered assorted perspectives connected the topics discussed, a definite sentiment permeated the hearing, which was that it’s precocious clip politicians connected some sides of the aisle travel unneurotic to make wide rules of the roadworthy for the crypto industry.

“Bipartisan enactment for crypto argumentation is nary longer a distant extremity connected the horizon,” said Jachym, with a definite consciousness of relief.

View source