Trove of evidence against Sam Bankman-Fried includes Caroline Ellison-authored document, ‘Things Sam is Freaking Out About’

2 years ago

U.S. authorities prosecutors person moved to admit and exclude circumstantial grounds successful the lawsuit of erstwhile FTX CEO Sam-Bankman Fried successful an Aug. 14 filing.

Caroline Ellison’s statements could go evidence

In the applicable filing, prosecutors asserted that communications from Bankman-Fried’s associates should not beryllium excluded arsenic hearsay. Notably, prosecutors program to see a enactment from erstwhile Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison that is colorfully titled “Things Sam is Freaking Out About” arsenic 1 portion of grounds of expected wrongdoing.

According to the filing, this document:

…delineates Ellison’s understanding, from conversations with the defendant, of what remained the defendant’s apical concern concerns, specified arsenic Alameda’s trading hedges, atrocious property astir the narration betwixt Alameda and FTX, and fundraising.

The database of grounds besides includes a signaling of Ellison that originated successful November 2022, astir the clip of FTX’s insolvency, that could besides beryllium utilized arsenic grounds against Bankman-Fried. Prosecutors said:

[During a] meeting, an worker asked Ellison who other had been alert of the shortfall successful FTX idiosyncratic funds. Ellison answered: “Yeah, I mean, I conjecture I talked astir it with, like, Sam [Bankman-Fried], Nishad [Singh], and Gary [Wang].”

The speech continued:

An worker pressed Ellison: “Who made the determination connected utilizing idiosyncratic deposits?” Ellison answered: “Um . . . Sam, I guess.”

Prosecutors argued that the supra statements are not hearsay owed to Ellison’s relation arsenic a co-conspirator successful Bankman-Fried’s expected wrongdoing and due to the fact that she acted arsenic an cause for Bankman-Fried during her employment.

Prosecutors besides said that erstwhile FTX DM co-CEO Ryan Salame conspired successful Bankman-Fried’s alleged run financing scheme. They recognized that Salame would not enactment arsenic a witnesser arsenic helium plans to invoke his close against self-incrimination, but suggested that Salame’s past statements astir his relation arsenic a “straw donor” who made donations connected behalf of Bankman-Fried are admissible arsenic grounds and are not hearsay.

Direct grounds volition apt beryllium admitted

Prosecutors besides asserted that definite grounds is admissible if it provides nonstop grounds of the crimes Bankman-Fried is accused of. Notably, prosecutors said that grounds of Bankman-Fried’s campaign financing violations should beryllium included arsenic grounds adjacent though they cannot presently question a condemnation connected that matter.

Prosecutors added that grounds concerning Bankman-Fried’s different alleged activities should besides beryllium admitted, specified arsenic mendacious statements to an unnamed bank, bribery of a Chinese authoritative concerning frozen accounts, instauration and manipulation of the FTT token, improper prioritization of payments to creditors, and connection autodeletion policies.

Government prosecutors said that Bankman-Fried should besides beryllium prevented from introducing circumstantial evidence. Among different things, they said helium should not present grounds that attempts to laic blasted connected the nationalist oregon regulators, suggests that helium intended to repay victims, oregon argues that immoderate of FTX’s disclaimers users marque the charges irrelevant.

SBF lawyers determination to exclude precocious evidence

Bankman-Fried’s ain lawyers responded to the government’s question by expressing their ain intent to exclude definite evidence.

The accused’s lawyers argued that prosecutors should not present grounds produced to the defence aft July 1. They noted that the authorities had missed find deadlines and has inactive failed to nutrient definite information, including the contents of Gary Wang’s laptop and Caroline Ellison’s encrypted Telegram chats. The defence argues that those delays person prevented them from afloat preparing for trial.

Bankman-Fried’s lawyers added that metadata should beryllium excluded arsenic grounds arsenic it tin beryllium altered. They noted that immoderate metadata is already incomplete oregon unreliable.

The defence lawyers further said that Bankman-Fried’s resignation from FTX should not beryllium admitted arsenic evidence. They said that elder enactment and extracurricular counsel “strongarmed” the erstwhile CEO into leaving the institution and said that those events bash not service arsenic grounds of immoderate actions helium committed previously.

Lawyers besides argued that prosecutors should not usage FTX’s bankruptcy and deficiency of solvency arsenic evidence, nor should they usage nationalist statements concerning FTX.US, which operated separately from FTX’s Bahamas-based platform, arsenic evidence.

The supra filings are the latest steps toward Bankman-Fried’s October trial, wherever helium volition look galore transgression charges outlined successful previous indictments. Bankman-Fried is currently being held astatine Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn.

The station Trove of grounds against Sam Bankman-Fried includes Caroline Ellison-authored document, ‘Things Sam is Freaking Out About’ appeared archetypal connected CryptoSlate.

View source