8 months ago
Four U.S. lawmakers person pressed Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen regarding crypto oversight gaps. The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), which Yellen chairs, has issued “repeated warnings astir the deficiency of oversight of the integer plus markets,” the lawmakers detailed, questioning Yellen however the assembly believes existing laws should use bitcoin, ether, and non-security crypto assets.
Lawmakers Want Answers From Yellen
Representatives Patrick McHenry, Glenn Thompson, French Hill, and Dusty Johnson sent a missive to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen concerning crypto regularisation connected Tuesday pursuing her grounds earlier the House Committee connected Financial Services. In her testimony, Yellen called connected Congress to “pass authorities to supply for the regularisation of stablecoins and of the spot marketplace for crypto-assets that are not securities.”
McHenry chairs the House Committee connected Financial Services; Thompson chairs the House Committee connected Agriculture; Hill chairs the Subcommittee connected Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Inclusion; and Johnson chairs the Subcommittee connected Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.
The missive explains that pursuing the illness of crypto speech FTX, the House Committees connected Agriculture and Financial Services “embarked connected a historical effort to trade authorities providing accrued regulatory oversight implicit the integer plus markets.” Specifically, the Financial Innovation and Technology Act for the 21st Century (FIT21) “would supply national regulators with wide authorization implicit the integer plus spot markets and guarantee the lawsuit protections seen successful the existent fiscal regulatory operation use to intermediaries and integer asset-related activities.”
The lawmakers pointed retired that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), which Yellen chairs, has issued “repeated warnings astir the deficiency of oversight of the integer plus markets” and has identified the aforesaid gaps they sought to code successful their legislation. The gaps see “limited nonstop oversight of the spot marketplace for integer assets that are not securities, opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, and whether vertically integrated marketplace structures tin and should beryllium accommodated nether existing laws and regulations.”
Commenting connected the authorization of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) successful regulating crypto, the Congress members shared with Yellen:
To item the gaps, bitcoin and ether person not been recognized arsenic securities … Because these underlying assets are not securities, neither the CFTC nor SEC has the authorization to registry and modulate trading platforms oregon different intermediaries engaged successful spot transactions successful some of these integer assets.
The lawmakers proceeded to inquire the Treasury Secretary immoderate questions “To further recognize however FSOC is facilitating coordination and connection betwixt the SEC and CFTC arsenic it relates to national oversight of the spot marketplace for integer assets that are not securities,” the missive reads. They asked Yellen to respond nary aboriginal than Feb. 20.
Firstly, the Congress members requested details of the Digital Assets Working Group’s meetings, from its 2017 inception to 2023. Secondly, the lawmakers question clarification from Yellen regarding the FSOC’s presumption that securities laws use to each crypto-asset issuers and secondary transactions involving these assets.
Moreover, referencing SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s claiming that astir crypto tokens suffice arsenic securities, they highlighted that “the last concern declaration investigation is backwards looking, made by a tribunal aft the transaction successful question has been completed.” They asked Yellen: “How does this reactive ineligible authorization supply capable extortion for customers, successful the lack of broad legislation?”
The lawmakers besides asked the Treasury Secretary: “Is it the presumption of FSOC that some bitcoin and ether are not securities?” In addition, they questioned: “Given the existing authorities of the CFTC implicit segments of the non-security integer plus market, is it the Council’s presumption that expanding the CFTC’s jurisdiction to encompass the spot marketplace successful non-security integer assets is appropriate?”
What bash you deliberation astir the lawmakers’ missive to Janet Yellen regarding crypto oversight? Let america cognize successful the comments conception below.
English (US) 