2 years ago
The arguments successful favour included biology concerns surrounding Bitcoin transactions and “the hazard to the movement’s estimation for accepting cryptocurrencies."
Requests for comments connected a connection urging the Wikimedia Foundation to halt accepting donations successful cryptocurrency person closed, with the bulk of users voting successful favor.
According to a Tuesday update connected the proposal, astir 71%, oregon 232 retired of 326, Wikimedia contributors who responded requested that the Wikimedia Foundation — the nonprofit that hosts Wikipedia — halt accepting cryptocurrency donations. The arguments successful favour of the proposition included biology concerns surrounding Bitcoin (BTC) transactions and “the hazard to the movement’s estimation for accepting cryptocurrencies.”
The assemblage archetypal opened the connection to comment connected Jan. 10, expanding the treatment to see topics similar El Salvador adopting BTC arsenic ineligible tender, crypto arsenic a instrumentality for illicit fiscal activities, and integer assets’ relation successful fiscal inclusion. However, the bulk of the topics seemed to absorption connected the vigor usage and imaginable biology interaction of cryptocurrencies.
“Cryptocurrencies whitethorn not align with the Wikimedia Foundation's committedness to biology sustainability,” said the archetypal proposal. “Bitcoin and Ethereum are the 2 astir highly-used cryptocurrencies, and are some proof-of-work, utilizing an tremendous magnitude of vigor [...] the existent models proceed to beryllium highly damaging to the environment. While determination are eco-friendlier cryptocurrencies, they are little widely-used.”
Among those arguments successful absorption of the connection included proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies that are “way little energy-intensive” and utilizing tokens to supply “safer ways to donate and prosecute successful concern for radical successful oppressive countries.” One idiosyncratic cited the Ukrainian authorities accepting crypto donations arsenic an statement against the exertion carrying a atrocious reputation.
“Crypto should stay an enactment for Wikimedia to judge donation,” said idiosyncratic C933103 connected March 14. “Wikimedia is accepting donations successful crypto not giving crypto out. If a country's instrumentality banned donation to [the Wikimedia Foundation, oregon WMF] done banks past it is the state successful the incorrect not WMF. Accepting donations alternatively of giving them retired besides mean it won't beryllium utilized to facilitate immoderate caller economical activities that could beryllium people of authorisation oregon beryllium backing different amerciable activities, arsenic each the received currency volition instantly beryllium converted to fiat currency successful WMF's account.”
what's that rumbling sound successful the distance, dilatory increasing louder, you ask?
it is the stampede of crypto zealots who person ne'er erstwhile donated to the wikimedia foundation, shouting "guess i'll instrumentality my wealth elsewhere!"
However, Wikimedia contributor TrueAnonyman supported the proposition, adding:
“The fiscal effect of nary longer accepting crypto donations would beryllium minimal, and acold outweighed by the reputational harm to the Wikimedia task of being seen to endorse a exertion truthful powerfully tied to assorted biology and societal harms.”Related: Wiki continues to judge crypto donations contempt unit to stop
The instauration reported successful January it received astir $130,000 worthy of crypto donations successful the past fiscal year, astir 0.08% of its revenue. Bitcoin was the astir utilized cryptocurrency among the 347 individuals who donated, but the nonprofit besides accepts Ether (ETH) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH).
English (US) 