Wikipedia Editors List FTX’s Questionable Blunder as the Top Trading Loss of All-Time

Following the illness of FTX astatine the opening of November, 2 apical executives from FTX and Alameda Research — Sam Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison — person been listed among traders with the apical trading losses worldwide connected Wikipedia. According to the Wiki page, Bankman-Fried’s and Ellison’s alleged ‘trading loss’ of 51 cardinal nominal U.S. dollars is astatine the apical of the database successful presumption of the highest nominal magnitude of funds mislaid by trading.

Wiki Article Prematurely Suggests FTX Fiasco Was a $51B ‘Trading Loss,’ Despite Ongoing Investigations

The FTX fiasco has been a large woody and according to data, it was 1 of the largest losses successful the fiscal satellite successful rather immoderate time. In fact, according to Wikipedia’s leafage called the “List of Trading Losses,” FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) and Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, person been added to the apical of the database for purportedly losing $51 billion. The alleged trading nonaccomplishment tied to SBF and Ellison eclipsed the erstwhile largest trading loss, which took spot successful 2021. Prior to the FTX collapse, Archegos Capital Management reportedly mislaid $10 cardinal successful full instrumentality swaps, and Archegos laminitis Bill Hwang reportedly mislaid it each successful 2 days.

Below the FTX and Archegos trading losses was Morgan Stanley’s and enslaved trader Howie Hubler’s nonaccomplishment of $9 cardinal successful 2008, arsenic the institution and trader mislaid the wealth from recognition default swaps. Four years later, JPMorgan Chase and Bruno Iksil mislaid $9 cardinal arsenic good from recognition default swaps. This year, the Chinese steadfast Tsingshan Holding Group tried to abbreviated the commodity nickel and mislaid $8 cardinal from the atrocious bets. Below China’s Tsingshan, Société Générale and Jérôme Kerviel mislaid $6.12 cardinal successful 2008. FTX’s losses, however, surpass the individually listed trading losses by a agelong shot, and Wikipedia editors explicate that the database includes “both fraudulent and non-fraudulent losses.”

Interestingly, the Wikipedia editors item that the funds associated with Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi strategy were not included. Madoff’s strategy reached astir the $50 cardinal range, akin to FTX, but Wikipedia editors accidental “Madoff did not suffer astir of this wealth successful trading.” In caller times, a fewer radical person painted galore similarities betwixt Bernie Madoff and SBF. What’s absorbing astir Wikipedia’s nonfiction is that editors marque the judgement telephone that Madoff’s tumble would not beryllium included due to the fact that it was a Ponzi scheme, but the FTX fiasco is included successful the list. This is contempt the information that FTX investigations are inactive ongoing, and the lawsuit has not been settled successful court.

Did FTX Really Lose $51 Billion successful Bad Trades?

There’s a slew of accusation that claims FTX’s and Alameda’s executives were “inexperienced and unsophisticated individuals,” and different study that shows it was imaginable that Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison was allegedly a horrible borderline trader. Further, there’s a batch of speculation that FTX’s and Alameda’s operations were Ponzi-like systems. Some person remarked that Alameda didn’t adjacent truly commercialized crypto, but alternatively “‘invested’ $8B crossed 448 venture-stage startups, astir of which person ‘1-10’ employees and zero documentation.” Furthermore, according to nakedcapitalism.com’s Yves Smith, nary 1 from the media has asked what happened to the $3.3 cardinal reportedly lent to SBF by Alameda. The alleged loans Alameda Research made totaled $4.1 billion, with astir going to SBF, and the information was disclosed successful a report published by the Financial Times (FT).

The FT study says SBF got a idiosyncratic indebtedness for $1 billion, and $2.3 cardinal was funneled to an SBF entity called Paper Bird. Former Mt Gox CEO Mark Karpelès created an FTX entity list, which shows Paper Bird is 1 of the apical companies nether SBF’s wing. So far, nakedcapitalism.com’s Smith says reporters interviewing SBF person not asked him wherever the $3.3 cardinal went. Furthermore, SBF ne'er truly explains successful his interviews wherefore apical FTX and Alameda execs were fixed specified “large idiosyncratic lines of credit.” Instead, SBF has described a unusual borderline trading process, and reports claim apical executives oregon “certain accounts” did not person to get oregon supply collateral to enactment successful FTX’s unusual borderline trading system.

With an ongoing probe and the courts conscionable getting progressive successful the FTX fiasco, it’s rather imaginable that Wikipedia’s judgement telephone to see FTX’s alleged ‘trading error’ successful the apical trading losses database whitethorn beryllium wrong. There’s a anticipation that Wikipedia editors whitethorn person to re-categorize the FTX case, successful the aforesaid mode that was applied to Madoff’s $50 cardinal blunder. The constituent is, arsenic of close now, there’s not capable grounds to accidental the FTX and Alameda fiasco was successful information a morganatic “trading loss,” oregon that astir of the $51 cardinal cited successful Wikipedia’s nonfiction was mislaid successful trading mistakes.

What bash you deliberation astir Wikipedia editors prematurely calling the FTX catastrophe a $51 cardinal trading loss? Let america cognize what you deliberation astir this taxable successful the comments conception below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This nonfiction is for informational purposes only. It is not a nonstop connection oregon solicitation of an connection to bargain oregon sell, oregon a proposal oregon endorsement of immoderate products, services, oregon companies. Bitcoin.com does not supply investment, tax, legal, oregon accounting advice. Neither the institution nor the writer is responsible, straight oregon indirectly, for immoderate harm oregon nonaccomplishment caused oregon alleged to beryllium caused by oregon successful transportation with the usage of oregon reliance connected immoderate content, goods oregon services mentioned successful this article.