1 year ago
Bitcoin mining excavation Luxor precocious tweeted that it had “harnessed its magic energy” to excavation a jpeg record into the blockchain.
This resulted successful block 774628 being importantly larger than the modular approximate 1 MB artifact size, astatine 3.96 MB.
The jpeg successful question depicts a bald, bearded “wizard” successful sunglasses, captioned by “taprootwizards.com, magic net jpegs, articulation us.”
Source: ordinals.com “Last night, Luxor harnessed its magic vigor and freed an past wizard from his cosmic cage wherever helium was trapped for galore epochs.
Keen observers of the concatenation of clip mightiness person noticed a 4MB anomaly, the likes of which person ne'er been seen.
Will determination beryllium others?…”
Bitcoin assemblage split
In a follow-up tweet, Luxor continued with the theatrical theme, mentioning the Taproot Wizard being “untethered and freed from his bondage!” portion pointing retired helium present exists “in the hearts, minds, and hard thrust abstraction of Bitcoin node operators.”
The tweet ended by referencing a refusal to beryllium censored and silenced, implying this was an workout successful state of expression.
“He refuses to beryllium censored, helium refuses to beryllium silenced.”
The Bitcoin assemblage gave a mixed reaction. In a Reddit post, purists argued that the Bitcoin blockchain should beryllium reserved lone for “real monetary transactions.”
Another said the scope for “vile and disgusting” jpegs to beryllium added permanently to the concatenation had been opened.
“Yeah… This is alternatively dangerous. We’re 1 atrocious histrion oregon 1 automated miner from cementing vile and disgusting things to a permenant, globally distributed, uncensorable database….”
One Redditor, who identified himself arsenic a node operator, said if a codification perpetrate existed to “not judge oregon relay these transactions,” helium would take it. In response, the poster was challenged arsenic endorsing censorship code.
Similarly, speech of the Bitcoin web not being a information retention concatenation was countered by a remark connected who decides Bitcoin’s uses.
“Who are you to determine what idiosyncratic uses Bitcoin for?”
Developer Jimmy Song waded in, saying:
“Luxor volition beryllium punished by the market. Just watch.”
Block size controversy
Block size limits the fig of transactions recorded wrong the block. Satoshi Nakamoto incorporated a 1 MB artifact size limit, which equates to astir three to 7 transactions per second, depending connected the size of the transactions.
There is simply a long-running statement connected whether this hinders the concatenation by putting the brakes connected scalability. Although Nakamoto ne'er specified wherefore a 1 MB bounds was set, immoderate speculate it was an anti-spam measurement designed to forestall web overload.
The station Bitcoin purists slam Luxor’s enactment of ‘magic net jpegs’ appeared archetypal connected CryptoSlate.
English (US) 