Quantum computers won’t break Bitcoin’s code, they’ll break its politics

1 hour ago

James Check, laminitis and pb expert astatine Bitcoin onchain investigation work Checkonchain, said Monday that the quantum menace is much of a statement occupation than a exertion issue.

In a Monday X post, Check claimed that “there is nary accidental we travel to statement to freeze” Bitcoin (BTC) that is not moved to quantum-resistant addresses, with improvement authorities limiting the community’s quality to react. This means that a ample magnitude of mislaid Bitcoin would flood the marketplace arsenic aged addresses are compromised erstwhile quantum machine attacks go feasible.

BitBo data shows that 32.4% of each Bitcoin has not been moved successful the past 5 years, 16.8% successful implicit 10 years, 8.2% successful 7 to 10 years, and 5.4% successful 5 to 7 years. How overmuch of those assets are really mislaid oregon inaccessible, and however galore are kept successful retention for truthful long, is taxable to debate.

Check’s station was responding to comments by Ceteris Paribus, caput of probe astatine crypto marketplace probe steadfast Delphi Digital. He said Bitcoin’s quantum menace occupation is not technological successful quality and “what makes the occupation specifically unsocial to BTC is that the tech occupation is secondary.” “Quantum resistant Bitcoin volition beryllium feasible but it doesn’t lick what you bash with the aged coins,“ helium said.

Talking to Cointelegraph successful precocious April, aboriginal cypherpunk Adam Back, cited by Satoshi Nakamoto successful the Bitcoin achromatic paper, said that the assemblage volition person to choose betwixt deprecating old, susceptible addresses oregon letting those funds beryllium stolen. Check thinks that the assemblage should “allow the aged coins to travel backmost to market.”

A hole for caller addresses only

The technological fundamentals for making Bitcoin quantum-resistant are successful place, with the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) having already endorsed aggregate post-quantum public-key cryptography schemes past year. If the Bitcoin assemblage decides to instrumentality them, quantum-resistant Bitcoin addresses are already wrong scope acknowledgment to those encryption standards — and the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 360 addresses this need.

Still, Bitcoin uses the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) signatures for bequest addresses and Schnorr signatures for Taproot, some of which are susceptible to quantum computers. For this reason, it is astir definite that a solution would necessitate the instauration of a caller post-quantum signature standard. Still, this raises the question of what volition hap to the ample magnitude of mislaid Bitcoin near successful non-quantum-resistant addresses.

During the interrogation with Cointelegraph, Back went arsenic acold arsenic to suggest that the quantum menace whitethorn uncover whether Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator is alive. He said that quantum computing whitethorn unit Nakamoto to determination their Bitcoin to debar it being stolen by quantum computers. Still, past week helium precocious said Bitcoin is improbable to look a meaningful menace from quantum computing for astatine slightest 2 to 4 decades.

Some blockchains got their fix

Experts thin to hold that a backwards-compatible hole that besides protects older addresses is improbable ever to beryllium developed for Bitcoin. Still, the aforesaid cannot beryllium said for immoderate different blockchains.

In precocious July, researchers unveiled a backwards-compatible quantum-resistant fix that would not necessitate signature switching. Unfortunately, the caller attack would use to Sui, Solana, Near, Cosmos and different networks, but not to Ethereum and Bitcoin.

That implementation leveraged peculiarities of the Edwards-curve Digital Signature Algorithm utilized by those networks. This strategy derives backstage keys deterministically from a seed, truthful researchers created a zero-knowledge impervious strategy that allowed 1 to beryllium they clasp the seed. If specified a impervious were required, a quantum-computer-falsified signature would not beryllium capable to hack an address.

Magazine: Bitcoin vs. the quantum machine threat: Timeline and solutions (2025–2035)

View source