The Risks Behind LUNA-UST Stablecoin, According to a Bearish Academic

In the past year, the space-themed Terra blockchain web has rocketed to prominence. UST, the dollar-denominated integer plus astatine the halfway of this fiscal universe, is present the third-largest stablecoin. LUNA, that stablecoin’s ballast, hovers nether $100 and is wrong the apical 10 most-used cryptocurrencies. And the blockchain itself, chiefly built and maintained by Terraform Labs, has go a hotbed for decentralized concern (DeFi) and different emerging marketplace activities.

But that maturation is apt “unsustainable,” University of Calgary instrumentality prof Ryan Clements said connected CoinDesk TV’s “First Mover.” Worse, Terra’s main backers – Terraform Labs, its CEO Do Kwon and the intimately related Luna Foundation Guard (LFG) – are seemingly alert of “systemic risks” to its algorithmic stablecoin arsenic they marque moves to bolster its reserves and incentivize marketplace demand.

"The information that Terra is acknowledging the request for reserves suggests that they don't deliberation the ecosystem successful and of itself is capable to beryllium capable to support this peg,” Clements said Wednesday morning. Clements has agelong been bearish connected “LUNA/UST,” having published an world review of the mechanics of algorithmic stablecoins and their surrounding fiscal ecosystem past October.

Backing up: Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies whose worth is tied to an extracurricular asset, specified arsenic the U.S. dollar oregon gold, to stabilize the terms and are utile successful the wider crypto economy. Unlike alleged centralized stablecoins that support their peg to the greenback by holding reserves, UST relies connected a narration to its sister token, LUNA. Terra, which is algorithmically burned oregon minted arsenic UST, U.S.-Terra LUNA floats supra oregon beneath the $1 mark.

Theoretically, this means LUNA/UST tin support itself without immoderate assets oregon collateral. Though, historically, astir different algorithmic, oregon uncollateralized, stablecoins (like Iron Finance's Titan Token) person crashed and burned.

The dynamics of the UST Terra-LUNA narration person evolved implicit time. Last month, the precocious incorporated LFG and different Terra backers announced plans to adhd bitcoin and AVAX arsenic reserve assets, which could beryllium sold disconnected successful lawsuit the narration betwixt UST-LUNA breaks down.

“Terra-UST was a purely algorithmic stablecoin,” Clements said, adding that with reserves it’s a antithetic “version” of what was primitively promised. This isn’t needfully a atrocious thing, helium said, and adjacent thinks the LFG has validated his predictions made past fall.

“Purely algorithm stablecoins are bound to neglect without reserves,” Clements said, and has said. He’s not alone. Ex-International Monetary Fund hazard expert turned fiscal plus blogger John Kiff told CoinDesk successful an email, “Despite Terra's large occurrence truthful far, I'm not convinced of the robustness of algorithmic stablecoins. This each sounds precise 2007-08ish!"

But the UST-Terra LUNA narration inactive has its risks, arsenic galore bears are wont to note. There’s the earthy volatility of the crypto market, the “inherently fragile” narration successful the LUNA-UST arbitrage and the hazard that Terra’s usage cases built astir UST aren’t really used. Perhaps the largest hazard comes from the Terra-based Anchor protocol, a “decentralized” lending level that pays astir 20% yields to those consenting to lend their assets to it. Currently, two-thirds of UST request comes from Anchor, Clemens said, a improvement encouraged by Terraform Labs, which built Anchor to incentivize usage of its blockchain.

However, lending request connected Anchor is importantly higher than borrowing request connected the protocol, and arsenic a result, the Terra Foundation has to “inject” superior to support the charismatic yields, Clements said. (Anchor precocious announced it would determination to adjusting its yields based connected demand, alternatively than keeping it astatine an artificial bounds of 20%.)

Clements points retired that a fig of factors could perchance origin instability successful Anchor, causing UST to go unpegged, including a competing borrowing protocol taking liquidity retired of Anchor. Terra’s staking rewards could besides fall, helium said, impacting that charismatic lending rate.

“Having to inject liquidity into Anchor successful bid to support those yields…that looks precise susceptible to maine implicit time,” helium said.

Further, comic arsenic it sounds, Terra’s bitcoin and AVAX reserves adhd their ain risks depending connected if they emergence oregon fall. Likewise, Terra’s “unique whale-holder status” could make risks for the wider crypto ecosystem, owed to problems of “cascading volatility” if they ever person to merchantability their bitcoin to support UST’s peg.

“My statement is not that [Terra] cannot beryllium stable, my statement is that successful bid for it to beryllium unchangeable determination are a fig of assumptions that person to hold,” Clements said.

He is calling for much transparency: Transparency astir whether Terra plans to further its reserve strategy, clarity astir the conditions successful which it mightiness merchantability its assets arsenic good arsenic different “disclosures and operational controls.”

“[Terra is] looking little and little decentralized implicit clip and overmuch much centralized,” helium said.

“If we’re wanting to usage this arsenic a signifier of money, it could beryllium adjuvant to person immoderate knowing of wherever the vulnerabilities are and wherever the power mechanisms are,” helium said.

The Festival for the Decentralized World

Thursday - Sunday, June 9-12, 2022

Austin, Texas